First and foremost; the January issue is available and the site updates are completed! So, don’t forget to get your copy of TCS today or at least drop by the site for a visit and let us know what you think at the blog or via e-mail. We are getting back on track after the computer catastrophe we experienced in December.
Also, please welcome Billy Bones BBQ, a new advertiser at TCS. Please take a moment if you are BBQ lover and check out Billy’s site by clicking on one of the links. Thanks Billy we hope that your association with TCS helps you meet your advertising objectives.
The TCS site is on track to have its best month ever in January as of today we are at over 1200 unique visitors and counting. We also have seen the most diversity of visiting locations. TCS has been visited by people from Moldova, Romania, China, Canada, Netherland
s, and the UK among others this month.
In one of my last posts I actually praised E. Sharp over at the Free Press for his story on the low flows over on the Lower AuSable below Foote Dam. Today, Sharp has more than undone whatever good he did with the Foote Dam story. He offers up his usual lefty slant on the new head of the Department of the Interior and seems to forget that he has any opinion at all in a story about the Rochester Hills deer cull. Let’s break it down shall we?
His piece on the new head of the interior is moving if you are living in a make believe utopia. It seems that E. Sharp has forgotten that industry is what drives America and that the fantastic new administration will have buddies and cronies of their own. It is after all human nature. The thing that astounds me is that Sharp also forgets a few simple realities. Cars and other engines still run on fuel and currently energy independence would entail actually exploiting some of our own resources. He even goes as far as to suggest that extracting oil from our own resources would turn the American west into a moonscape. I wonder how Sharp will describe massive fields of windmills and solar panels? I have news for Sharp; you are currently a big user of fossil fuels just like the rest of us. I guarantee, regardless of how you rationalize it he is using a bunch. People can not enjoy and recreate in the outdoors unless they have an income and that income depends on industry. I wonder how much an elk, bear, or mule deer would actually care about having to walk under an oil rig?
This brings me to my point about E. Sharps second story. In the Rochester Hills deer cull story he does a great job of reporting news but forgets that he actually has an opinion (surprised?). I wonder if he forgets his opinion because it would actually mean he would have to lean a little to center or right and make a case for the recreation that he makes a living off of. There are a few people in Rochester Hills who feel bad about actually killing food and haven even went as far as taking it to court. E. Sharp has decided that in this instance it really isn’t important that a deer isn’t a person, has a brain the size of a peach, is concerned only with where it eats, sleeps, and reproduces, and is essentially food for us. Deer don’t create jobs, pay taxes, read, drive, work, and they certainly don’t study at the highly regarded left universities. In this case they are highly adaptable creatures of habit that happen to be in the way. The deer is more important than the driver that hit it on his way to work; not to mention the associated cost for the 911 call, the emergency personnel dispatched to the scene, the delay of commerce associated with the accident, and the cost to repair the vehicle. Are you ready for the brave new world where there is no consequence to making things (and commerce) and deer are more important than you?
Thanks for dropping in.